 |
[ IV-1a ] |
or in terms of the electromagnetic potentials
 |
[ IV-1b ] |
Let us now write the total time derivative of a component of
the vector potential
 |
[ IV-2 ] |
so that
 |
[ IV-3 ] |
Therefore, we may write the Lorentz force as
 |
[ IV-4 ] |
We may also write
so that Equation [ IV-4] becomes
 |
[ IV-5 ] |
which may, in turn, may be written
 |
[ IV-6 ] |
This last equation may now be compared to the Lagrangian equation
of motion -- i.e.
 |
[ IV-7a ] |
where, in general,
 |
[ IV-7b ] |
Therefore, we identify
 |
[ IV-8 ] |
as the Lagrangian for a single charged particle. We may write
 |
[ IV-9a ] |
which, in light of Equation [ IV-8 ], becomes
 |
[ IV-9b ] |
Therefore,
 |
[ IV-9c ] |
and, using the cannonically conjugate momenta associated Equation [
IV-8 ] --
i.e.,
 |
[ IV-10 ] |
-- we see that Equation [ IV-9c ] can be written
 |
[ IV-11a ] |
or finally
 |
[ IV-11b ] |
We are now in a position to set forth the nonrelativistic Hamiltonian
of a single charged particle -- viz.
 |
[ IV-12 ] |
with the canonical conjugate variables given by
 |
[ IV-13a ] |
 |
[ IV-13b ] |
In principal, we are done, since we may now write the complete
Hamiltonian for a many particle material system as
 |
[ IV-14 ] |
Unfortunately, this form of the Hamiltonian is not the most useful in
optical physics since it is expressed in terms of the vector potential
and needs to be evaluated at all charge positions. Most annoyingly, it
does not yield an interaction term in the form used earlier -- i.e.
Equation
[ III-3a ] in the lecture set entitled The Interaction of Radiation
and Matter: Semiclassical Theory.
THE MULTIPOLE EXPANSION OF THE CLASSICAL HAMILTONIAN:
Before we manipulate the Hamiltonian further, we digress a
bit to get a better fix on what we are really look for. From the most basic
notions of electrostatics, the energy of interaction with an external
transverse field should be expressible as the "energy of assembly"
[2]--
viz.
 |
[ IV-15a ] |
which becomes for a neutral atomwith
charge centered at 
 |
[ IV-15b ] |
Electric fields of interest vary only slightly over an atom
so that we should be able to expand the external field in a rapidly converging
series as follows
 |
[ IV-16 ] |
Substituting this expansion into Equation [ IV-15b ] and integrating
we obtain
 |
[ IV-17a ] |
Formally, we may cast this expansion for the interaction energy
in the form
 |
[ IV-17b ] |
In the continuum picture, the interaction energy should be
expressible in the form
 |
[ IV-18 ] |
where
is the polarization density. It may be shown quite easily that Equations
[ IV-18 ] and [ IV-17 ] are equivalent if the polarization density is expressed
in the following multipole expansion
 |
[ IV-19 ] |
With this background, we return to a consideration of the Hamiltonian
in Equation [ IV-14 ]. In what follows, we show that this Hamiltonian is
transformed into a form which consistent with Equation [ IV-17b ] if we
make an appropriate
gauge transformation of the fields. In general,
the gauge transformation
 |
[ IV-20 ] |
where
is an arbitrary scalar gauge function, leaves the electric and magnetic
fields unchanged. Motivated by the discussion above, we choose the gauge
function
 |
[ IV-21 ] |
where
is the polarization density in the form shown in Equation [ IV-19 ] and
is the vector potential appearing in Equation [ IV-14 ]. The impact of
the transformation on the scalar potential term in Equation [ IV-14 ] is
easy to evaluate -- viz.
 |
[ IV-22 ] |
Dealing with the transformation
 |
[ IV-23 ] |
is straightforward, but extremely tedious (and not very useful)! Substituting
for
from Equation [ IV-19 ] and doing a lot of integrating by parts we could
demonstrate that
 |
[ IV-24 ] |
Making use of these results, the complete Hamiltonian of a atom plus
radiation field may be written
 |
[ IV-25 ] |
In practical terms, the usefulcomplete Hamiltonian is
written
 |
[ IV-26a ] |
where
 |
[ IV-26b ] |
 |
[ IV-26c ] |
 |
[ IV-26d ] |
 |
[ IV-26e ] |
 |
[ IV-26f ] |
 |
[ IV-26g ] |
If we take
of the order of magnitude of the Bohr radius
,
of order
,
and
of order
then we may estimate the three linear interaction terms[3]
-- viz.

Further we note that
!!